home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Hacker Chronicles 2
/
HACKER2.BIN
/
831.ISDN
/
000087_isdn-distribution-owner_Fri Dec 10 04:27:28 1993.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-01-02
|
2KB
|
51 lines
Received: from nac.no ([129.240.2.40]) by relay.cs.toronto.edu with SMTP id <435186>; Fri, 10 Dec 1993 04:27:21 -0500
Received: from comix.atik.no by nac.no with SMTP (PP) id <12006-0@nac.no>;
Fri, 10 Dec 1993 10:19:11 +0100
X400-Received: by mta elc1.atik.no in /PRMD=uninett/ADMD= /C=no/; Relayed;
Fri, 10 Dec 1993 10:17:35 +0100
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1993 04:17:35 -0500
X400-Originator: isdn-request@teknologi.agderforskning.no
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uninett/ADMD= /C=no/;elc1.atik..722:10.11.93.09.17.35]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: isdn@teknologi.agderforskning.no ; Fri, 10 Dec 1993
10:17:35 +0100;
From: Charles Sederholm <cts@cs.hut.fi>
Message-ID: <Mailstrom.1.03.2832.9822.cts@cs.hut.fi>
To: "D.J. Atkinson" <dj@its.bldrdoc.gov>
Cc: isdn@teknologi.agderforskning.no
In-Reply-To: <"aun.uninet.157:09.11.93.20.15.47"@uninett.no>
Subject: Re: ISDN at home (not)
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> One thing I've never understood is the reason that the
> RBOCs use to justify wanting to charge for the data
> calls. It doesn't cost them any more to provide a data
> call than it does for them to provide a voice call. Can
> anyone enlighten me?
FYI -
In Finland (Europe), I'm happy to say, both local telephone companies like
Helsinki Telephone Company and Telecom Finland do not seem to charge data or
voice calls differently. We use the network for voice (audio), video and
data...
Charles
--
Charles Sederholm
Internet: Charles.Sederholm@cs.hut.fi
X.400: C=fi;ADMD=fumail;O=hut;S=Sederholm;G=Charles
Phone (nat): 90-4513240 Fax (nat): 90-4513293
(int): +358-0-4513240 (int): +358-0-4513293
Institute of Industrial Automation
Helsinki University of Technology
Otakaari 1; SF-02150 Espoo; Finland